Tag: michigan asset protection attorney

Is Life Insurance Asset Protected in Michigan?

March 27, 2011 /

As a Grand Rapids, Michigan estate planning and asset protection attorney I’ve been asked several times, “Is life insurance protected from my creditors?”  And sometimes it’s more specific, “is the cash value of life insurance protected from my creditors.”

Well, the answer is maybe yes, maybe no.  You see, there is a seeming incompatibility between the statutory law and the case law (court-based law) in Michigan.  In MCL 500.2207(1) it says that the proceeds of any life insurance policy payable to the wife, husband or children of the insured or to a trust for their benefit, including the cash value thereof, is exempt from claims of the insured’s creditors (read it by clicking here).

Seems to be pretty clear, right?  Wrong.  There are a couple of cases in Michigan where creditors were allowed to garnish the cash value of the insured’s (debtor’s) life insurance policy.  The cases are:

  • Chrysler First Business Credit Corporation v. Rotenberg v John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 789 F. Supp 870 (1992) – read it by clicking here.
  • Schenck Boncher & Prasher v. Vanderlaan, 2003 Mich. App. Lexis 2082 (2003) – read it by clicking here

Well that sort of muddies the water, doesn’t it?  And if you go back to MCL 500.2207(1) and read it in the context of 500.2207(2), you could read “cash value” to reference not the cash value during the insured’s lifetime, but rather only the cash value component of the proceeds after the insured’s death.

Here’s the kicker . . . there IS a way to fully protect life insurance cash value from creditors.  That is the topic of a future blog post, so make sure to check back regularly.

And if you (or your client/customer) can’t wait that long.  Call us at 616-827-7596 to schedule a Peace of Mind Planning Session to discover how to asset protect and tax-proof your life insurance and create a lasting legacy for generations to come.

Michael Lichterman is an estate planning and business planning attorney who helps families and business owners create a lasting legacy by planning for their Whole Family Wealth™.  This goes beyond merely planning for finances – it’s about who your are and what’s important to you.  He focuses on estate and asset protection planning for  the “experienced” generation, the “sandwich generation” (caring for parents and children), doctors/physicians, nurses, lawyers, dentists, professionals with minor children, family owned businesses and pet planning.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients – many of which have become great friends.

Michigan LLC Charging Order Asset Protection

March 6, 2011 /

So you’ve read my post about charging orders against Michigan LLCs and are thinking, “so what?!”   Well, the key is not so much what it is, but whether it is the only remedy a creditor may have or just one of many.

Much review and comment has been made about a 2010 Florida case, Olmstead v FTC, 44 So 3d 76, and the effect it may have on the level of asset protection provided by a Single-Member Limited Liability Company.  Why?  Because the court determined that, under Florida law, a creditor is not limited to a charging order as a means of collecting on the judgment.  That could mean the creditor could “step into the shoes” of the LLC Member, effectively taking all ownership in the company and directing it as the creditor sees fit.  I think all Michigan LLC owners can agree, that’s a bad thing.

Well, Michigan business attorneys and the Michigan legislature were listening to the scuttlebutt.  What came out of it was a change to Michigan law via a 2010 amendment to the Michigan Limited Liability Company Act (the MLLCA).  Section 507 (MCL 450.4507) of the MLLCA now makes it clear that the charging order is the “exclusive remedy” by which a judgment creditor of a Member may satisfy a judgment out of a Member’s membership interest.

And THAT is a good thing for asset protection.  It limits the creditor to distributions from the LLC.  No distributions = nothing to the creditor.  And the creditor is not able to have any say in the LLC’s actions . . . it leaves the Member in control of the company.  And that is a great thing for Michigan business owners!

Important Note: there is still some belief that a court could find that a charging order is not the only remedy in certain circumstances involving a single-member LLC.   Make sure to meet with a Michigan business lawyer before making any decisions.

Michael Lichterman is a relationship-based business attorney who leverages his business, marketing and legal knowledge to help business owners and entrepreneurs create a Foundation for Business Success™.  This goes beyond merely drafting a set of documents – it’s about  proactively preparing the business and the business owner for continued growth while remembering the “human side” of running a business.  He best serves small business owners (less than 50 employees) and entrepreneurs.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients  and their businesses – many of which have become great friends and trusted confidants.